# Specimen nr. 2867a loaded 3 times in Tension testing # Ref.: J.Bauschinger, "Ueber die Veraenderung der Elasticitaetsgrenze # und der Festigkeit des Eisens und Stahls durch Strecken und Quetschen, # durch Erwaermen und Abkuehlen und durch oftmal wiederholt Beanspruchung," # Mittheilungen aus dem Mechanisch-Technischen Laboratorium der # K. Technischen Hochschule in Muenchen, 1886, Seiten 1-116 plus 3 figures. # (there are two "Seiten" numbers per page) # # Copyright (C) 2014 Fatigue Design Evaluation Comm. # Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document # under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 # or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; # with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. # A copy of the license is available here: # "GNU Free Documentation License": "http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html" # # Bauschinger's tables are composed of half-cycles in tension or # compression, with some unload/reload interludes in these larger # half cycle sets. Each half cycle test has re-zeroed the # extensometer. Also at the begin of each set he measured the diameter # and the length of the sample, but I suspect that the length # measurement is not as accurate as the extensometer measurements. # At the top of a tensile half cycle set, or at bottom of the compressive # half cycles, the scales of the extensometer become unreadable due to # continuous flow caused by the load/weight increment. There is often # no unloaded deflection reading after this occurs, thus one must guess # at the final defl. at the large loads, or use the next set's initial # measured specimen length to back calculated where the previous peak # ended. # Thus some of the end points of the half cycle sets printed here are # questionable guesses made by me and should not be blamed on Bauschinger. # Note that when there are 3 numbers in a line and the first two are 0, # then the third number is a left-over deflection from the previous test # loading, and should be added to all following deflections. # AC Oct 2014 # Table IX, tension and Compressioin test of Weld metal # Spec. nr. 2867a # As received run; Tension, d=4.55co, l=6.00cm # data on pages 75-78 of report 0 0 0 4 0.66 8 1.34 12 2.02 16 2.70 0 0.07 #unload 16 2.72 20 3.39 24 4.04 28 4.74 32 5.42 0 0.16 #unload 32 5.46 34 5.80 0 0.06 # unload strain not reported here. estimate 0.169 per tonne # 6 days later, restart tension d=4.55cm l=6.00cm 0 0 0.06 #appears to be a re-zero of extensometer 4 0.63 8 1.31 12 1.95 16 2.62 0 0.02 # unload 16 2.63 20 3.28 24 3.92 28 4.58 32 5.24 0 0.01 #unload 32 5.22 36 6.15 0 0.41 # 51 min. puase start compression test; d=4.55 l=6.00 0 0 0.41 #; note add of previous reading -4 -.69 -8 -1.36 -12 -2.04 -16 -2.76 0 -0.18 -16 -2.79 -20 -3.15 -24 -4.24 -28 -5.07 -32 -6.16 0. -.94 -32 -6.31 -36 -8.76 0 -2.90 #unload notice plas. strain # a 5min pause restart compression; d=4.55, l=6.0 0 0 -2.90 # re-zero gauge -4 -0.60 -8 -1.26 -12 -1.90 -16 -2.58 0 +0.02 # (effectively zero) -16 -2.55 -20 -3.23 -28 -4.57 -32 -5.27 0 -0.02 # unloaded -32 -5.29 -36 -8.02 0 -1.15 #unload: plas strain 0 -1.06 # after 20hrs # restart in compression after 20hrs d=4.55 l=6.00 0 0 -1.06 # rezero -4 -0.63 -8 -1.29 -12 -1.93 -16 -2.59 0 -0.02 #unload -16 -2.57 -20 -3.24 -24 -3.90 -28 -4.57 -32 -5.25 0 -0.05 #unload -32 -5.28 -36 -6.25 0 -.028 #Stop Oct. 18 1885 # for 1hr the restart in Tension d=4.55 l=6.00 0 0 -.028 4 0.62 # there is a typo here in Bauschinger report 8 1.55 12 2.41 16 3.34 0 0.76 #unload 16 3.37 20 4.37 24 5.48 28 6.67 32 7.99 0 2.88 # unload (got plas. strain) 32 8.12 36 9.59 0 3.71 # Stop nr. 4 # 46 min pause restart in compression d=4.55 l=6.00cm 0 0 3.71 -4 -.77 -8 -1.65 -12 -2.62 -16 -3.63 0 -0.99 -16 -3.69 -20 -4.71 -24 -5.82 -28 -7.12 -32 -9.03 0 -3.68 #unload/reload -32 -9.36 -36 -13 # <- this is only an estimate: sclase run trhuogh, slight 0 -6.91 #estimate 36*0.169 for unload # squishing of sample. He should have taken a reading # unloading. # 30-1/2 hrs, unloaded, restart a compression test. 0 0 -6.91 #(estimate only)# =4.55cm l=6.00cm -4 -0.66 -8 -1.31 -12 -1.92 -16 -2.62 0 0.0 0 # After 15 1/2 hrs restart in tension 0 0 0 4 0.82 8 1.79 12 2.93 16 4.33 0 1.70 # wait 2 hrs then restart in tensioin 0 0 1.70 4 0.69 8 1.33 12 2.00 16 2.76 18 3.42 0 0.48 # After 9 min., during which the load was repeatedly applied # 4 times between 0 and 18ton. through which the total deformation # increased to 3.65 and the permanent deformaton increased to 0.72/1000cm # (cyclic creep ? ) # Restart in Tension, d=4.55 l=6.00 0 0 0.72 4 0.69 8 1.32 12 1.96 16 2.61 18 2.98 0 0.06 # After 27 hrs restart in compression; d=4.55 l=6.00 0 0 0.06 -4 -0.68 -8 -1.39 -12 -2.14 -16 -2.90 -18 -3.30 0 -0.31 -18 -3.31 -20 -3.78 -24 -4.75 -28 -5.83 -32 -7.18 0 -1.79 -32 -7.33 -36 -10.40 -40 -25.15 -43 -77.24 # (strain is estimated by AC) # Bauschinger notes that specimen is "strongly squished" # After 30 min pause, restart in compression # d=4.58cm l=5.93cm <- note the permanent set. 0 0 -70 # (assume unload elastic from -43ton ) -4 -0.69 -8 -1.37 -12 -2.05 -16 -2.70 0 0 0 -16 -2.70 -20 -3.40 -24 -4.10 -28 -4.8 -32 -5.49 0 -0.09 # -32 -5.52 -36 -6.38 -40 -8.02 -42 -9.90 -44 -15 #Scales run through. Strain is a guess by AC # Unload strains not recorded. # After a 3 day pause, restart in Tension d=4.8cm l=5.93cm 0 0 -7.60 # Strain is a guess by AC based on elastic unload) 4 0.74 8 1.82 12 3.09 16 4.74 0 2.11 16 5.01 20 7.14 24 10.07 28 13.31 32 20.00 0 14.61 # 32 20.62 36 28.25 40 42.25 44 70 # deflection is a guess by AC # Bauschinger comment: scales run trough without reaching 44 tons. # Note: Bauschinger did 9 more tests after this but all have very # little plastic strain, so they are not recored here. # Final l = 5.84 thus (6.00 -5.94)/6.00 = 0.010 comp. strain